In the landmark case of A, B, C v Ireland, three women, known as A, B and C, challenged
This case was lodged with the European Court of Human Rights in August 2005. The challenge was heard at a full hearing before its Grand Chamber of seventeen judges (the highest Chamber of the Court) on December 9, 2009.
The case was taken by three women, supported by the IFPA, who travelled abroad for abortion services. They argued that the criminalisation of abortion services in
The first applicant, A, had children in the care of the State as a result of personal problems and considered a further child would jeopardise the successful reunification of her existing family.
The second applicant, B, was not prepared to become a single parent.
The third applicant, C, was in remission from cancer when she became pregnant. Unaware that she was pregnant, she underwent a series of check-ups contraindicated during pregnancy. She claimed she could not obtain clear advice about the risks to her health and life and to the foetus if she continued to term.
The three applicants, who all became pregnant unintentionally, told the Court that the impossibility of obtaining an abortion in
They contended that
In December 2010, the Court delivered its judgment
In January 2012, the Government established an expert group to advise the Government on the implementation of judgment.
In late November 2012, the expert group report was published. The report stated:“The X case is the law of the State, as declared by its highest Court. It is binding on all lower courts and generally.” It also stated: “It would obviously be insufficient for the State to interpret the Court’s judgment as requiring only a procedure to establish entitlement to termination without also giving access to such necessary treatment.” The report expressed concern that any option short of legislation could fail to fulfill the requirements of the European Court of Human Rights.
In July 2013 President Michael D Higgins signed the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Act into law. The Act commenced on 1 January 2014.
Supervision of A, B and C v Ireland by the Council of Europe
The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe oversees the implementation or "execution" of rulings of the European Court of Human Rights. The Committee monitored the A, B and C v Ireland judgment under its enhanced supervision procedure, and issued decisions in relation to the Irish Government's progress in giving effect to the judgment at its meetings in September 2011, March and December 2012 and March 2013.
During these meetings, the Committee expressed concern at the Government’s delay in implementing the judgment in A, B and C v Ireland and underlined the importance of putting in place "substantive measures" to execute the judgment. At its December 2012 meeting the Committee of Ministers noted the view of the expert group that only the implementation of a "statutory framework" would provide a defence from criminal prosecution and urged the Irish Government to "expedite" implementation of the judgment in the A, B and C v Ireland case.
In December 2014, the Committee of Ministers closed the case, noting that the Irish Government had given effect to the ruling by introducing the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Act 2013.
Read the full judgment of ABC v Ireland here.